A1: No. The VFA is an agreement between the two countries to support the Mutual Defence Treaty (MDT). The MDT was established in 1951 between the United States and the Philippines to provide mutual assistance in the event of an attack on foreigners. As a contract for the execution of the VFA, EDCA authorizes the prepositioning of war materials on approved sites. This includes strengthening the modernization capabilities of the Philippine armed forces. READ: The pH of the military pact with the UNITED States) The U.S.-Philippine Alliance, created in 1951 by the Mutual Defense Treaty, he was no stranger to stress tests – whether it was the renegotiation of basic agreements in the 1970s or the closure of U.S. military facilities in the early 1990s (which, as we recall, led to the 1999 VFA after the growing perception of the Philippine threat to China). From this point of view, the takeover of Duterte`s presidency has provoked the Alliance`s biggest test of resistance in decades, striving to separate Manila from Washington and maintain closer relations with China and Russia, which are in some obstacles, but which still lead to periodic crises and the slowdown in U.S.-Philippine cooperation in some areas. For many American observers, the fact that most of the criminals charged are ultimately charged in a local court and convicted that the system works; for some observers in the host country, it reinforces the perception that the VFA protects the culprits and makes the exceptions more egregious. Meanwhile, Bagares argued that executive agreements based on the VFA «would have no leg to stand on» if the VFA were abolished. – with reports from Sofia Tomacruz/Rappler.com many in the Philippines, especially in defence and foreign policy institutions, want the VFA to continue. On February 6, 2020, Foreign Minister Teodoro Locsin Jr. reportedly said at a Philippine Senate hearing that the continuation of the agreement was «more beneficial» to the Philippines than to end it.
Some supporters are trying to avoid President Duterte`s actions. On February 10, the Philippine Senate passed a resolution asking the president to reconsider his intention to repeal the agreement, and on March 2, he passed a resolution asking the Supreme Court to rule on whether the Senate should approve the dissolution of the treaty, which the political statement said is unclear. The presidential palace has announced that it will consider a Supreme Court decision on the matter. The main effect of the agreement is to require the U.S. government to notify the Philippine authorities when it is aware of the arrest, arrest or detention of Filipino personnel visiting the United States and, at the request of the Philippine government, to invite the competent authorities to exercise jurisdiction on behalf of the Philippines, except in cases of particular interest to the State Department or the Secretary of Defense.  [VIII1] The waiver of U.S. jurisdiction is complicated because the United States is a federation of American states and therefore a federation of jurisdictions. «It is indeed the right of the Philippine government to do so if it finds that the agreement is no longer in our national interest,» Defence Minister Delfin Lorenzana said on 24 January. According to the text of the diplomatic note, the six-month waiver «may be extended by the Philippines for a further six months.» At the end of this period, Manila, unless further action is taken, would return to its original plan to denounce the agreement, which was first announced on 11 February 2020.